|
Obesity Rivals Tobacco for Most
U.S. Deaths
CDC Predicts Inactivity, Unhealthy Eating to Overtake Cancer by 2004
USA (By Rob Stein, WP) March 9, 2004 - Americans'
sedentary lifestyle and poor eating habits are poised to overtake cigarette
smoking as the nation's leading cause of preventable deaths, federal health
officials reported today.
Although tobacco is still the top cause of
avoidable deaths, the combination of physical inactivity and unhealthy diets is
gaining rapidly because of the resulting epidemic of obesity, officials said.
"Obesity is catching up to tobacco as the
leading cause of death in America. If this trend continues, it will soon
overtake tobacco," said Julie L. Gerberding, director of the federal Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, which conducted the study.
Based on current trends, obesity will
become No. 1 by 2004, with the toll surpassing 500,000 deaths a year, rivaling
the annual deaths from cancer, the researchers found.
"This is a tragedy," Gerberding said. "We
are looking at this as a wake-up call."
In response, the Bush administration
announced a new public education campaign, including a humorous advertising
campaign that encourages Americans to take small steps to lose weight. In
addition, the National Institutes of Health proposed an anti-obesity research
agenda. On Thursday, a special task force will present the Food and Drug
Administration with formal recommendations on what that influential agency can
to do to help reverse the cresting public health crisis.
"Americans need to understand that
overweight and obesity are literally killing us," said Health and Human Services
Secretary Tommy G. Thompson in a statement. "To know that poor eating habits and
inactivity are on the verge of surpassing tobacco use as the leading cause of
preventable death in America should motivate all Americans to take action to
protect their health. We need to tackle America's weight issues as aggressively
as we are addressing smoking and tobacco."
Critics, however, immediately denounced the
moves as inadequate, saying the administration should take tougher steps to
encourage healthier eating and force the food industry to improve their products
and stop advertising junk food to children.
"If the government said, 'You really ought
to cut back on soft drinks and juice drinks,' those lobbyists would go berserk.
They don't want to take on the food industry," said Marion Nestle, a professor
of nutrition and public health at New York University. "The focus is all on
physical activity. It's perfectly safe. It's totally uncontroversial. But it's
not enough to keep weight under control."
The new estimates of the rising toll of
obesity come in the first update of a landmark paper that ranked the nation's
preventable causes of death in 1990.
Cigarette smoking, which increases the risk
for a host of illnesses including lung cancer, emphysema and heart disease,
topped that list. But anti-smoking campaigns have led to a steady decline in the
number of Americans who use tobacco, slowing the rise in the resulting toll of
illness and death.
In the new analysis, which is being
published in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association, Gerberding
and her colleagues conducted a comprehensive analysis of the medical literature
and analyzedpreventable deaths for the year 2000.
Tobacco still topped the list, accounting
for 435,000 deaths, or 18.1 percent of the total. But poor diet and physical
inactivity were close behind and rapidly gaining, causing 400,000 deaths or 16.6
percent. That represented a dramatic change from just 10 years earlier, when
tobacco killed 400,000 Americans (19 percent) and poor diet and physical
inactivity killed 300,000 (14 percent).
"There's been a big narrowing of the gap,"
said Ali H. Mokdad, who heads the CDC's behavioral research branch. It's
particularly striking because the toll of every other leading cause of
preventable death — including alcohol, infections and accidents — steadily
decreased during the same period, Mokdad said.
For example, in 1990, the third leading
cause of preventable death, alcohol, was responsible for 100,000 deaths. By
2000, that number had dropped to 85,000.
But despite intense public concern, the
number of Americans who are overweight or obese has continued to rise, reaching
epidemic proportions. In 1990, about 15 percent of adult Americans were obese.
By 1990, that number had climbed to 30 percent, with 65 percent being
overweight.
"Physical inactivity and poor diet is still
on the rise. So the mortality will still go up. That's the alarming part — the
behavior is still going in the wrong direction," Mokdad said.
Being overweight and obese makes people
much more likely to be stricken by a variety of health problems, including
diabetes, heart disease and cancer.
The new findings come a day after another
study concluded that if current trends continue, one out every five dollars
spent on health care in the United States will go toward obesity-related
treatment by the year 2020.
The trend was not surprising, given the
skyrocketing obesity rates, said Richard Atkinson, president of the American
Obesity Association. But the problem calls for a more intensive, innovative
response, Atkinson said.
"There has been an explosion in obesity,"
Atkinson said. "If we just count on the American population to change their
eating habits and exercise habits, we're going to continue to have obesity. What
we're doing is not working."
The government should consider more
innovative strategies than simply encouraging people to eat better and exercise,
such as subsidizing the cost of healthy foods like fresh fruits and vegetables
to make it more affordable to eat well.
"Let's start looking at things that make a
difference," he said.
Morgan Downey, the association's executive
director, said he was disappointed that the NIH plan did not include any new
funding or staff. "I think it's a step in the right direction but they are not
committing any additional funding," Downey said. "It's a solid B."
Kelly Brownell, director of Yale
University's Center for Eating and Weight Disorders, criticized the
administration for failing to be more aggressive long ago.
"Even now, the administration defaults to
explaining the problem away by individual responsibility and lack of physical
activity rather than focusing on the toxic food environment," Brownell said.
"The USDA [Department of Agriculture] has
the power to get rid of soft drinks and snack foods in the schools and they're
not. The FTC [Federal Trade Commission] could deal with the tidal wave of
unhealthy food advertising aimed at children. The government could change
agriculture policy to subsidize the industry making healthy foods instead of
unhealthy ones," he said. |